STANLEY COX, STATE REPRESENTATIVE

CAPITOL REPORT
Home
Issues
Events & Links
Contact Us

seal_mo.jpg

Subscribe to "Capitol Report" by email by submitting this form:

DEBATE.JPG

Full name:
Email address:
   
 

Achieves Capitol Report

Stanley Explains His Voter ID Proposal to Current TV (link)

The Fourth of July is more than a day for fireworks and cookouts

June 25, 2009

Why Celebrate the 4th of July?

 

In a few days we will celebrate the Fourth of July with cookouts and fireworks. This is a good time to be reminded of the importance of this holiday to the course of human history.  It was on that day 233 years ago that the 13 American colonies declared their independence from Great Britain. Thomas Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence, one of the greatest documents in the long struggle of mankind for freedom from oppressive government.  Many people believe that this document is the philosophical ground work for the Constitution which was later adopted.

 

The Declaration contained these words that made it far more than just another political document:

 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."

 

The ideas expressed in the Declaration were not new. Indeed, they had been expressed by British philosophers such as John Locke, and similar sentiments had been used in Britain to justify rebellion against King James II in 1688. But Jefferson's words struck a chord across America, and across the world; they still reverberate today.

 

Fifty-six American leaders in the Continental Congress stepped forward to sign the final document, at enormous personal risk. Many Americans today have no idea of the great sacrifices that were made by the Founders to win our freedom. What happened to the signers?

 

Five signers were captured by the British and brutally tortured as traitors. Nine fought in the War for Independence and died from wounds or from hardships they suffered. Two lost their sons in the Continental Army. Another two had sons captured. At least a dozen of the fifty-six had their homes pillaged and burned.

 

What kind of men were they? Twenty-five were lawyers or jurists. Eleven were merchants. Nine were farmers or large plantation owners. One was a teacher, one a musician, and one a printer. These were men of means and education, yet they signed the Declaration of Independence, knowing full well that the penalty could be death if they were captured.

 

In the face of the advancing British Army, the Continental Congress fled from Philadelphia to Baltimore on December 12, 1776. It was an especially anxious time for John Hancock, the President, as his wife had just given birth to a baby girl. Due to the complications stemming from the trip to Baltimore, the child lived only a few months.

 

Richard Stockton, a New Jersey State Supreme Court Justice, had rushed back to his estate near Princeton after signing the Declaration of Independence to find that his wife and children were living like refugees with friends. They had been betrayed by a Tory sympathizer who also revealed Stockton's own whereabouts. British troops pulled him from his bed one night, beat him and threw him in jail where he almost starved to death. When he was finally released, he went home to find his estate had been looted, his possessions burned, and his horses stolen. Judge Stockton had been so badly treated in prison that his health was ruined and he died before the war's end. His surviving family had to live the remainder of their lives off charity.

 

Carter Braxton was a wealthy planter and trader. One by one his ships were captured by the British navy. He loaned a large sum of money to the American cause; it was never paid back. He was forced to sell his plantations and mortgage his other properties to pay his debts.

 

Thomas Heyward, Jr., Edward Rutledge and Arthur Middleton, all of South Carolina, were captured by the British during the Charleston Campaign in 1780. They were kept in dungeons at the St. Augustine Prison until exchanged a year later.

 

At the Battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr. noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the family home for his headquarters. Nelson urged General George Washington to open fire on his own home. This was done, and the home was destroyed. Nelson later died broke.

 

"Honest John" Hart, a New Jersey farmer, had to leave his wife's bedside when she was near death. Their thirteen children fled for their lives. Hart's fields and his grist mill were laid waste. For over a year he eluded capture by hiding in nearby forests. He never knew where his bed would be the next night and often slept in caves. When he finally returned home, he found that his wife had died, his children disappeared, and his farm and stock were completely destroyed. Hart himself died in 1779 without ever seeing any of his family again.

 

Such were the stories and sacrifices typical of those who risked everything to sign the Declaration of Independence. These men were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more.

 

Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged:

 

"For the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of the Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."

 

We Americans should be inspired by the boldness and courage of these founding fathers.  With all the challenges of their day, they resolved that human liberty was of the highest importance and they committed their lives accordingly.  We will continue to be blessed by God if we as a nation continue to be guided by these same principles of individual freedom and liberty.  For other stories of these patriots you can go to http://nhccs.org/Destiny.html.   

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

 

 

June 18, 2009

First Interim Committee Begins Meeting


Although the legislative session ended almost a month ago, a lot has happened since then. Earlier this month, the governor signed the priority legislation from this session, the economic development bill.  The goal of this bill, which became effective upon his signature, is to jumpstart Missouris slumping economy. 


In addition to bill signings, House Speaker Ron Richard has begun to name interim committees.  Interim committees are committees that meet to look into a specific issue while the legislature is not in session. Some interim committees are created by legislation passed during the session and some are created by the Speaker.


Last week the Speaker named the first interim committee, the House Interim Committee on State Intelligence Analysis Oversight.  This committee was established in response to a highly controversial report published in February by an office within the Department of Public Safety, the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC).  As part of the center's routine intelligence gathering and dissemination to law enforcement agencies, it sent out a report on how to identify members of the modern militia movement who may be domestic terrorists. The report, printed on state letterhead, identified people who may be part of the modern militia movement.  Shockingly, these people included those who support small government and gun owners rights, oppose abortion and illegal immigration and voted for Paul, Barr or Baldwin in the November 2008 election.


Although the Department of Public Safety apologized for the report, we in the House are concerned about how a report like this could even be issued a report that attacks our 1st and 2nd amendment rights.  Who reviews these types of reports and approves their dissemination?  The Interim Committee on State Intelligence Analysis Oversight will look into these concerns and determine if there is enough public accountability for the MIAC.  Earlier this week, the committee held its first meeting at the Capitol.  At this meeting, committee members discussed the process of intelligence gathering and analysis with staff from the MIAC, toured the centers facilities and provided the public with an opportunity to express their concerns.


I was very concerned when I first heard about this report and am happy to know that my colleagues are looking into public accountability of the MIAC.  I understand intelligence that will improve public safety needs to be shared among the states law enforcement agencies.  However, calling someone a potential terrorist based on broad statements about a groups political views is something I am not okay with. The committee will hold several meetings throughout the state to give Missourians the opportunity to provide testimony. I plan to keep tabs on the work of this interim committee and urge you to as well. 


If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

June 9, 2009

Crimes and Illegal Immigration

As a former Prosecuting Attorney I have a great interest in the laws that are intended to protect all us from the criminals in our society. As a member of the Crime Prevention Committee of the Missouri House I have the opportunity to work for changes in the law that makes us safer in our homes and or neighborhoods. A number of these provisions have been passed by both the House and the Senate this year and are on the Governors desk. I will discuss some of these provisions in this weeks report.

House Bill 62 is a wide-ranging crime bill, sometimes referred to as an Omnibus Crime Bill, which makes a number of changes to Missouri statutes to ensure safer roads and waterways and to enact additional restrictions on sexual offenders.

The legislation places several new restrictions on sex offenders. One provision prevents sex offenders from being within 500 feet of a park that has playground equipment or a swimming pool. The bill also prevents sex offenders from being a coach or trainer of a sports team that has a member who is younger than 17. In addition, sex offenders are prohibited from going within 500 feet of a childcare facility. However, the provision does not affect persons visiting their own child.

House Bill 62 also makes it illegal to bring beer bongs or kegs onto most Missouri rivers or streams. Violating this provision is punishable by up to a year in prison. In addition, the bill increases penalties for cattle rustlers. It prohibits the use or possession of an alcohol beverage vaporizer and requires the Department of Health and Senior Services to implement an education and awareness program regarding the financial exploitation of the elderly. It also prohibits the use of a false or misleading diploma in connection with admission to a college or university or with any employment opportunity.

One provision of the bill prohibits drivers 21 and younger from sending, reading, or writing text messages or electronic messages while operating a moving vehicle on highways in Missouri. If pulled over for texting, a driver could be ticketed with a moving violation. The text messaging prohibition does not apply to a person operating a motor vehicle who sends a text message to report illegal activity, summon medical or other emergency help, prevent personal injury or property damage, or to relay information between a for-hire operator and a dispatcher.

Another bill that passed this year is Senate Bill 36 & 112 which makes the penalty for forcible rape or sodomy of a child under the age of twelve life imprisonment without eligibility for probation and parole at any time. Currently, the penalty for these crimes is a term of imprisonment with no eligibility for probation or parole until the offender has served at least 30 years.

As I have previously discussed, House Bill 152 expands the current law in Missouri, requiring a DNA cheek swab of any arrestees related to violent, sexual or burglary charges.  That sample will then be added to his or her file.  Presently, seventeen states have passed this including Kansas, Arkansas, and Texas.  In addition, thirteen more states are currently considering it. As I indicated previously, this is a significant change in the law that will help protect our citizens from some of the most dangerous criminal predators. In the states that have previously adopted similar provisions, serial rapist and murders have be apprehended as a direct result of this legislation. I am pleased to have played a significant role in the passage of this legislation.

In addition to these changes in the criminal law, the General Assembly this year took an important step toward protecting tax payers from the burden of paying tuition for illegal immigrants who seek be enrolled in our public colleges and universities. House Bill 390 prohibits college or university students who are unlawfully present in the United States from receiving certain types of financial aid, including institutional aid and state-administered post-secondary grants and scholarships. The bill also requires all postsecondary institutions of higher education annually certify to the Department of Higher Education that they have not knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States. There have been document cases in other states where illegal aliens and enrolled and completed studies subsidized by tax payers to later find out that they could not obtain employment because of their illegal status. This legislation will help eliminate this possibility.

Making our communities a safer place to live and work is a primary purpose of government. My life experience has given me some unique perspective in regard to drafting and passing legislation that will help protect the victims of crime and punish the criminals. I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be able to be involved in this process and to represent you in the Missouri House of Representatives.

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact: Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

Over the next few weeks I will provide some detail of legislation which passed both houses of the Missouri General Assembly this year and is on the Governors desk

June 2, 2009

Keeping Our Commitment to Public Education

Over the next few weeks I will provide some detail concerning legislation which passed both houses of the Missouri General Assembly this year and is on the Governors desk.  Since one of the primary purposes of State Government is the education of or children, I will first discuss the education bill we passed this year. 

A wide-ranging education bill, Senate Bill 291, makes several changes in the law.  First of all, it fixes a glitch in the school funding formula to allow approximately $108 million generated by Proposition A to be distributed to Missouri schools.  It also attempts to reduce the number of high school dropouts by requiring students to earn at least 16 credits or turn 17 before dropping out.  Current law allows a 16 year old to drop out.  This law has been tried in another state and early results indicate that it not only keeps children in school longer but resulted in more of them graduating.  It also provides for regulation of the use of seclusion rooms which are being used by school districts on children with the most difficult behavior problems.   This act requires school district discipline policies to prohibit confining a student in an unattended, locked space except for an emergency situation while awaiting the arrival of law enforcement personnel.

Additionally this legislation requires each public school to develop standards for teaching by June 30, 2010. The teaching standards must include: having students actively participate and be successful in the learning process; forms of assessment to monitor and manage student learning; having the teacher be prepared and knowledgeable of content and maintain students' on-task behavior; having the teacher be current on instructional knowledge and explore changes in teaching behavior; and having the teacher act as a responsible professional in the mission of the school.

This act requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to produce "The Parents' Bill of Rights," to inform parents of children with an individualized education program of their educational rights under federal and state law by January 1, 2010. The publication must contain ten points of information, which are described in the act. Each school district must provide a copy of "The Parents' Bill of Rights" upon determining that a student qualifies for an individualized education program and at any such time as a school district is required under state or federal law to provide the parent or parents with notice of procedural safeguards.  The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must post a copy of it on its website.

This act establishes the "Foster Care Education Bill of Rights." Each school district must designate a staff person to be an educational liaison for foster care children. This liaison would assist with proper educational placements, transferring between schools, ensuring transfer of grades and credits, requesting school records, and submitting school records that have been requested. This law would clarify that a child in Foster Care my attend school in their original district or the district where they currently reside.

The law provides that beginning with the 2010-2011 school year, school districts must ensure that students in elementary schools participate in moderate physical activity, as described in the act, for the entire school year for an average of 150 minutes per week, or thirty minutes per day. Students with disabilities must participate to the extent appropriate. Middle school students may, at the school's discretion, participate in at least 225 minutes of physical activity per week.

Finally, this bill allows school boards to establish a four-day school week instead of a five-day school week by the adoption a resolution by a majority vote of board members. Any school district that does so must file a calendar with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. A minimum term for a school district adopting a four-day school week includes 142 days and 1044 hours of pupil attendance. A school district that adopts a four-day school week and subsequently meets at least two fewer performance standards on its annual performance report over a two year period must revert to a five-day school week. If the school district then meets the same number of performance standards it had met prior to adopting the four-day school week, it can resume a four-day school week.  The reason I supported this portion of the bill is that there are a few financially strapped districts in Missouri that need to make this extraordinary change to be able to continue to function.

 

As I have previously told you the House held to our promise to our schools and Budget Chairman Allen Icet did and amazing job to continue the Houses commitment to education spending without a tax increase.  We were able to meet the States other obligations and still increase funding of the school funding formula for the fourth year.  This years increase was $63 million.  These are challenging times.  Despite these challenges, the General Assembly stepped up the plate and hit a home-run for the school children of Missouri.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

End-of-Session Capitol Report 2009

May 26, 2009

End-of-Session Capitol Report   2009

 

The House recently concluded a successful final week of the 2009 legislative session.  On the last day, House members waited for the Senate to pass House Bill 191, designed to create good-paying jobs with health benefits. The House sent several versions of the bill to the Senate during the course of the session, but didnt receive agreement on the issue until the final day.   Our House Speaker Ron Richard, praised his colleagues for working diligently to secure passage of the bill.  I also want to thank Rep. Tim Flook from Liberty for tireless work on the bill to help businesses hire quality workers during these tough economic times.

 

The final bill expands the highly successful Quality Jobs program and increases the caps on the tax credits available through the program from $60 million to $80 million annually. It also increases the caps on the New Markets Tax Credit Program from $15 million to $25 million annually; expands the BUILD program and increases the cap on the tax credits offered through the program from $15 million to $25 million each year; allows the Missouri Department of Economic Development to include pre-employment training in its new or expanded industry training; and institutes additional tax credit reporting requirements to ensure accountability for all tax credits issued.

 

The House held to our promise to our schools and Budget Chairman Allen Icet did and amazing job to continue the Houses commitment to education spending without a tax increase. This stems from responsible fiscal leadership by figuring out how to actually increase funding for schools. Included in that is a $63.2 million increase for the states foundation formula. The budget also keeps higher education institutions at their FY 2009 funding levels; guaranteeing no tuition increases for college students and working families. In addition, the budget authorizes a $545 million increase for the states MO HealthNet program. The budget also includes full funding for Community College Jobs Retention Training ($10 million), Community College New Jobs Training ($16 million) and Jobs Development ($10.6 million) programs as well as $82 million for job training from federal stimulus funds. 

 

Rep. Icet told the press that, We, unlike many states, are protecting taxpayers by making sure we are not balancing our budget on a bad check from the federal government, Icet said. By cutting back spending where necessary and living within our means, we have fulfilled our promise to fully fund education without burdening our citizens with a tax increase."

 

Another piece of legislation passed this year was A wide-ranging education bill that fixes a glitch in the school funding formula to allow approximately $108 million generated by Proposition A to be distributed to Missouri schools; attempts to reduce the number of high school dropouts by requiring students to earn at least 16 credits or turn 17 before dropping out; and authorizes the Joint Committee on Education to study the issue of open enrollment among all public schools.  Over the next several weeks I will describe some of the other legislation passed this year.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 20, 2009

Real Health Care Reform

 

As the federal government continues to hand out billions of dollars in bailout money, we face a dilemma: What is the most responsible way to use these funds?  House Republicans have joined me in declaring that, in Missouri, we will not commit these dollars to ongoing programs that cant be supported in the future when federal stimulus funding runs out. Some very intense budget debates took place on the House floor regarding this matter. One of the focal points of that discussion was whether or not to use the stimulus funds to expand our already out of control welfare system. While our Governor and the Senate supported the idea, the House stood up and called it irresponsible. 

 

The House worked to provide health care to those who need it most those who are uninsurable -- rather than expanding a system that was dangerously close to bankrupting our state just a few years ago.

 

In 2005, the Missouri General Assembly took action to reform what was then an out of control welfare program. Rampant fraud and abuse plagued the Medicaid system. Able-bodied man and woman who could have afforded their own health care coverage were instead receiving it on the taxpayers dime. People were being added at a rate that our budget simply could not sustain. If the legislature hadnt taken made the very tough decision to reform the system, Missouri would have been in a state of severe financial crisis. I can assure you, we made the right choice.

 

Rather than following the governor down a road we already know will lead to disaster, the Missouri House decided to endeavor to create a health care plan that will provide coverage to those who need it most. We opted to work to create the Show Me Health Care Initiative to provide health care coverage to our uninsurable population. These Missourians are people who have a pre-existing conditions and arent able to receive insurance because they are seen as a high risk by providers.  This population is going without the care they require to manage their health problems, and we dont think thats fair. Our plan would cover this population by utilizing funds that would have otherwise gone to an expansion of our welfare system. The plan would also place a focus on wellness and prevention, requiring a level of personal accountability from all plan participants. We believe this will provide quality health care to approximately 21,000 Missourians initially and act as a fiscally responsible program, unlike an expansion of the welfare rolls.

 

There is no such thing as a bottomless bucket of money, even though the federal government and the governor are acting like it.  For a fiscal conservative like me, it is important that we value each and every taxpayer dollar and utilize those in ways that makes sense. Expanding our welfare rolls, as the governor suggests, is highly irresponsible considering our state has already seen how close to bankruptcy the system brought us just a few years ago. We want to make sure those most in need are able to obtain health care coverage and I am proud of the plan we developed this session to provide insurance to the uninsurable. We were not successful this year in getting the Senate and the Governor to adopt plan for improving access and affordability to health care. Despite this setback, we are committed to work in the future for this type of health care reform.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

Budget week update

May 11, 2009

Budget Bills Passed Legislature

 

The First Legislative Session of the 95th Missouri General Assembly ends on Friday May 15th.   The last two weeks of session often means late nights and heated debates about where to allocate funds. However, this year weve seen a change of pace. For the most part, finalization went quite smoothly, with a willingness to work across the aisle.  

 

By law, the budget has to be passed and on the governors desk by Friday, May 8th. While this may not be the most exciting time of session, we know it is our responsibility to pass a balanced budget for the State of Missouri. To jumpstart the process, the budget conference committees met earlier last week to try and iron out the differences between the House and the Senate in addition to conflicts between the parties.

 

When the conference committee reports hit the House floor for approval last Wednesday, for the most part, the compromises made by the committee members were accepted with bipartisan support.  However, when we began to discuss House Bill 11, which allocates money for Social Services in Missouri, the fundamental differences between the two sides of the aisle became obvious to everyone in the chamber.  The Senate version of House Bill 11 included funding to expand our system of taxpayer- funded health care to include 35,000 able- bodied people.  After a long and very heated debate, we defeated the bill and sent it back to conference to resolve this fundamental difference and ensure we do not expand the welfare system.  I voted against this bill because I believe that my constituents did not send me to Jefferson City to expand welfare expenditures by $290,000,000.  It is my firm belief that such an expansion would necessitate a tax increase in two or three years.

 

On Thursday, the committee returned the bill to the House floor after working with the Senate to remove the language that would expand the welfare system.  Instead, it took a more common sense approach to healthcare.  The committee replaced the across -the- board increase in eligibility with a program that would preserve our valuable health care resources for the truly needy, not the greedy.  These are people who have existing health conditions and are truly sick and need our help.  The legislation to create this program called Show-Me Health Coverage, is set out in Senate Bill 306, which still must be approved by both the House and the Senate.

 

I can report to you that we meet our Constitutional deadline and approved the entire budget last Friday.  I am very pleased with the changes made to the House Bill 11 and I plan to support SB 306. Please know that I am a strong advocate for helping Missourians in need. However, given the current economic situation of our country and state, it is neither smart nor responsible to allocate more funding for welfare. That is why I could not support the original bill.  With the new bill language and SB 306, those who cant help themselves-not those who choose not to- will receive the proper benefits.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

House Unveils Largest Tax Cut in Missouri History

April 30, 2009

 

House Unveils Largest Tax Cut in Missouri History

 

In a recent interview, our Governor said that he wanted to spend every last cent of the stimulus package for ongoing projects and welfare expansion, regardless of federal strings attached.  In fact, Governor Nixon went as far as to say, If theres debt, Missouri kids and grandkids will pay that debt off.  Frankly, we couldnt disagree more. 

 

The stimulus package sent to us by the federal government is a one-time occurrence.  Spending it on programs that expand our already out of control welfare system is irresponsible and we simply wont do it.  The Governors proposal clearly isnt prudent budgeting. 

 

I am proud to announce that the House has passed a bill, taking one billion dollars in stimulus money and using it to cut your taxes.  If passed through the Senate and signed into law, this will rein as the largest tax cut in Missouri history.

 

In the House, it is our firm belief that the only way to truly stimulate our economy is to give you back your hard-earned dollars and allow you to spend or save them as you please.  Specifically, our plan is to cut taxes across all brackets for those who pay taxes and make at least $9,000 a year.  This comes with a sunset of two years, preventing our state from being saddled with the extra-financial burden when the stimulus dollars run out. 

 

Dont let the word stimulus package fool you.  These are YOUR tax dollars.  You know how to spend the funds in a way that will benefit your family and stimulate our economy.  Missouri taxpayers are responsible we dont need the government to make your decisions for us.

 

We will not stand by and sling financial burden on the backs of our future.  Together, we can build back our states economy and look towards a promising future for our children and grandchildren. 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

 

Over the past four months, I have talked a lot about the Family Recovery Plan our legislative package to help Missourians through these tough economic times

April 23, 2009

Income Tax Reduction

 

This session, our largest priority has been the Family Recovery Plan.  This legislation plan was designed to give our citizens relief in the harsh economic climate.  There are four parts of the Family Recovery Plan: Taxes, Jobs, Energy, and Healthcare.  This week, the House passed HB64, which seeks to reduce income tax. We believe this will aid in stimulating the economy and provide much needed tax relief to Missouri families and small businesses.

 

At the federal level, reducing an individuals income tax has proven to be very successful. In the 1920s, presidents Harding and Coolidge slashed tax rates by more than 50 percent and the gross domestic product - the measure of national wealth - rose at an annual rate of almost 1.5 times the previous rate. In the 1960s, presidents Kennedy and Johnson also proved lower taxes meant higher growth by cutting top tax rates from 91 percent to 70 percent. When these cuts were enacted in 1965, growth and private investments increased dramatically. Then, in the 1980s, President Reagan once again proved this correlation by cutting taxes. During Reagan's two terms he cut taxes across the board and the gross domestic product growth averaged 3.2 percent compared with 2.8 percent in the eight years preceding his election.

 

We are looking forward to a similar achievement at the state level.  HB64, sponsored by Representative Lipke, has two main provisions that will reduce taxes.  The first provision will provide savings for all Missouri taxpayers by increasing the amount of federal tax an individual can deduct from their state taxes.  We increased this deduction from $5,000 to $7,500 for an individual and $10,000 to $15,000 for a married couple.   This will also help small businesses across the state, seeing that approximately 50 percent of small businesses pay their taxes as individuals.  On the surface this change may look like a loss of revenue to the state, but a reduction in income taxes is normally followed by an increase in collection of capital gains taxes.  The second part of the bill will allow income to flow back into family budgets.  The bill raises dependent exemption to $1,600 -- which has not changed since 1998 when it was increased from $400 to $1,200.  By increasing the exemption by $400 per child, Missouri families will be able to keep more of their income to pay for necessities.

 

As I have promised since we started this session, my top priority is to pass legislation that will help you, my constituents, weather these rough times.  There is no question that by cutting taxes, we can stimulate the economy. That is why I supported this tax reform legislation.   If you have specific questions about this or other matters, please send them to me.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

Mandatory DNA Testing for Violent Criminals

April 18, 2009

Mandatory DNA Testing for Violent Criminals

 

In the state of California, Chester Turner was arrested for assault with a firearm.  Unfortunately, there was not enough substantial evidence to convict him and he was set free.  After that, he was arrested a total of twenty-one times and later convicted of rape.  At that time, his DNA was taken and put on file.  His DNA matched twelve other rape and murder victims.  Had Chester Turners DNA been taken when he was arrested the first time, it is probable that eleven of his victims would still be alive.

This disturbing story caught the attention of several lawmakers nationwide, causing many to realize the importance of DNA testing even on crimes as common as burglary and assault.

 

In 2006, there were 80,000 violent crimes committed in Missouri.  There were 1,500 rapes in 2007.  Over 500 of those rapes were to children under the age of six.  The numbers speak for themselves.  There was no question in our mind something had to be done.  That is why we introduced and passed House Bill 152.  In addition to being a cosponsor, I work with the primary sponsor, Representative Marilyn Ruestman at both the Committee level and on the House Floor.  Being a former Prosecutor, I know the anguish and fear that criminals bring upon their victims.

 

HB152 expands the current law in Missouri, requiring a DNA cheek swab of any arrestees related to violent, sexual or burglary charges.  That sample will then be added to his or her file.  Presently, seventeen states have passed this including Kansas, Arkansas, and Texas.  In addition, thirteen more states are currently considering it.

 

The main opposition calls this procedure an invasion of privacy.  Frankly, Im not really concerned about that.  These people have broken the law, and some in the vilest manner.  Collecting DNA by use of rubbing a swab in the inside of an arrestees month is no more intrusive than taking finger prints.  It is just another way to identify people.  In my opinion, having their DNA on file could be life-saving and is worth fighting for.

 

 I hope you will stand behind me on this legislation and support HB152.  Case studies and vast research have proven that this procedure produces good, positive results.  Many states have saved thousands of lives through this simple step in the right direction.  We hope to make Missouri one of them.  If you have specific questions about this or other matters, please send them to me.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

Mr

 

April 9, 2009

Increasing Public Involvement in Judicial Appointments

 

Over 60 years ago Missourians became fed up with the corruption in our judicial system and took steps to shed light on the process of appointing judges.  In 1940, the state adopted a plan for appointing appellate judges, the justices of the state Supreme Court and circuit judges in the urban areas.  Known as the Missouri Plan, it worked to change the appointment method from backroom deals to a structured and fair process.  However, the appointment of these judges in Missouri is currently not as open and balanced as it could be, is done in secret and is dominated by one special interest group-the Missouri Bar.  There is still room for improvement. 

 

The Missouri Plan establishes a commission to review potential candidates for appointment.  The current law provides the Governor with a list of three nominees to choose from within a 60 day period.  If not, the commission has authority to choose the appointment.  Once a judge has served in office for at least one year, he or she must stand for retention at the next general election.

 

I believe changes are needed to make the system more transparent and balanced.  This is why if sponsored House Joint Resolution 10, which passed the House this week.    Currently, because of its make-up, the commission is heavily influenced by the Missouri Bar.  It is made up of a Supreme Court Justice, three members of the Bar and three members of the general public.  HJR10 increases the number of commissioners on the Appellate Judicial Commission to include an additional member of the public.  In addition, each member of the commission would be subject to Senate confirmation.   My House Joint Resolution, for the first time, brings openness to the selection process.  Because of this new openness, citizens will have the ability to evaluate whether the best nominees are being chosen for these important positions.

 

HJR10 also provides the Governor with more choices in the selection process.  Under the current Missouri Plan, if the Governor does not see one of the three nominees as being a solid, the commission has no obligation to provide additional choices.   Under the proposed changes of HJR10, the Governor would be given four names from which to choose and has the ability to reject the list and ask for an additional four choices. 

 

Allowing a broader range of nominees when choosing such an important position is highly beneficial.  Being careful and selective when appointing these Judges should be a top priority.  The Missouri Plan has been left with room for progress and I and eighty four (84) other of my House Colleagues believe HJR10 is a clear answer.   

 

Nothing in my HJR would alter our citizen’s right to the retention votes on these judges.  Bottom line, HJR10 would make the process more public, make it more accountable and remove the dominance of special interest groups.  Incidentally, these were the goals of the original “Missouri Plan.”   If you have specific questions, please send them to me.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

Protecting you and yours

April 1, 2009

 

Measures to Protect You, Your Home and Your Family

 

In the past, Missouri citizens were held liable for defense against intruders in their homes.  Luckily, that has all changed.  In 2007, legislators passed the Castle Doctrine which justifies the use of deadly force if someone unlawfully enters your home and you feel threatened.  I am glad to report that this session, we are going even further to secure you, your family, and your property when break-and-enter cases arise. 

 

House Bill 668, introduced by Representative Kenny Jones, expands the Castle Doctrine by including laws that protect your property – not just your home.  The bill extends deadly force rights to land owners/leasers and eliminates the requirement to retreat from your property, which is beneficial for several reasons.  It covers the base on something as simple as standing at your mailbox and being attacked by an intruder as well as cases such as cattle rustling or someone attempting to steal a piece of farm equipment. You are now able to react confidently to protect yourself and others around you.   

 

Additionally, HB 668 lowers the minimum age requirement for obtaining a concealed carry endorsement from 23 years of age to 21. At the age of 21, Missouri citizens have reached adulthood and been granted full rights.  We expect citizens of this age to be responsible enough to own a gun and use it for protection if needed. Changing the age requirement will legally allow them to defend themselves should the occasion arise.

 

The legislation has been filed, passed out of committee and is hopefully making its way to the floor for debate.   

 

We want this bill to send a clear message to criminals: if you enter a home or property unlawfully, you may be facing very serious consequences.  We hope that HB 668 puts a damper on these offenses and allows Missourians to rest with a little more ease when they go to sleep at night.  We believe as land and property owners, you deserve these rights.  You shouldn’t be limited when it comes to your livelihood and the safety of your family.  We are hard at work to make sure of it. 

 

As always, I welcome any feedback on this issue and encourage you to contact my office with your thoughts or concerns.

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

January 8,  2008

 

2009 Legislative Session Begins With Focus on Missouri Families

 

This week marked the opening of the 2009 legislative session and with it the beginning of our efforts to provide relief to Missourians struggling with the current economic downturn. Every session brings with it a new set of challenges and this one will be no different. We know hard-working Missourians want and need help during these trying times. While the federal government is preoccupied with billion dollar bailout plans for big business, we here in the Missouri House will place our focus where it is needed most on Missouri families.

 

During opening day proceedings, I had the honor of voting in our new leader, Speaker of the House Ron Richard, who will direct our legislative efforts to help Missouri families. Speaker Richard has worked over the years to promote economic development and create good-paying jobs for Missourians. I firmly believe he and the other members of our leadership team will provide the guidance we need as we work to revitalize our economy through job creation initiatives; lower the tax burden on hard-working Missourians; explore alternative energy sources to lessen our dependency on foreign oil; and improve the affordability and accessibility of our system of healthcare.  

 

During his opening day address, Speaker Richard outlined those four main points that make up what we are calling our Family Recovery Plan. Under the plan we will work to expand successful job-creating initiatives like the Quality Jobs Program and develop innovative incentives that will attract new businesses to our state. We will work to revise our personal income tax to provide a modest tax cut that will keep more of your hard-earned dollars in your pocket where they belong. We will explore ways to improve our system of healthcare so it is affordable and accessible while at the same time ensuring it is free of the waste, fraud and abuse that has plagued it in the past. And we will find ways to promote development of our alternative energy sources such as clean coal, wind farms, hydroelectric and nuclear power.

 

We know the Family Recovery Plan is essential to provide Missourians with the assistance they need during these tough economic times. However, we also know there are many more issues we will face this session. At the top of our list will be crafting a budget that spends your tax dollars in a way that is responsible and cost effective. The sound financial planning of the past has placed our state in a fortunate position during these trying times, but we must face the realities of a tight budget year and be prepared to use your tax dollars in the most efficient manner possible.  Also this year we will work to improve our system of education so that each child is prepared for future success and we will continue efforts to ensure the goal of a college education is one that is attainable for every Missouri student. We will reaffirm our commitment to protecting the lives of the unborn and build on the success the legislature has had in greatly reducing the number of abortions in our state in recent years. In addition, we will stand firm in protecting the rights of gun owners regardless of how the national political landscape may change.

 

We have an aggressive agenda before us this session and I am excited to take on the challenge of turning some of these ideas into effective policies. The Family Recovery Plan will be the cornerstone on which our legislative successes will be built, but it is only one part of the body of work we will complete this year. For any of the legislation we pass, you can rest assured we will have the best interests of Missouri families at heart. Where our federal government has failed to act, the Missouri House will remain committed to seeking effective solutions to the problems faced by Missourians from all walks of life.

 

Continue to let me know your thoughts about these or other matter of concern to you by calling (573) 751-9774 or by emailing me at stanley.cox@house.mo.gov .

 

If you would like to unsubscribe to this Capitol Report

Please contact:  Karen.Henry@house.mo.gov

 

 

 

PAID FOR BY STAN COX FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE, BEN EMBREE TREASURER

SmallElephant.gif

THIS SITE DESIGNED BY FLAT CREEK INVESTORS LLC